Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials

Kurt Kroenke, Timothy E. Stump, Chen X. Chen, Jacob Kean, Matthew J. Bair, Teresa M. Damush, Erin E. Krebs, Patrick O. Monahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scales are increasingly being used to measure symptoms in research and practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimally important difference (MID) and severity thresholds (cut-points) for the four fixed-length PROMIS depression scales. Methods: The study sample was adult participants in three randomized clinical trials (N=651). MID was estimated using multiple distribution- and anchor-based approaches including assessing correspondence between Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and PROMIS depression scores. Results: The best MID estimate was a PROMIS depression T-score of 3.5 points with most methods producing an MID in the 3 to 4 point range across all three samples. MID estimates were similar for all four PROMIS scales. A PHQ-9 1-point change equated to a PROMIS 1.25-point T-score change. PROMIS T-scores of 55, 60, 65, and 70 appeared to be reasonable thresholds for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Limitations: The study sample was predominantly male veterans with either chronic pain (2 trials) or previous stroke (1 trial). The severity of depression was mild to moderate. Conclusion: A T-score of 3 to 4 points is a reasonable MID for PROMIS depression scales and can be used to assess treatment effects in both practice and research as well to calculate sample sizes for clinical trials. Severity cut-points can help interpret the meaning of scores and action thresholds for treatment decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-108
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume266
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders R01 award to Dr. Monahan (R01 AR064081) and Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Merit Review awards to Drs. Bair (IIR 10-128), Krebs (IIR 11-125), and Damush (VA HSRD QUERI Service Directed Project SDP- 10-379). Dr. Chen was supported by the grant numbers KL2TR001106 and UL1TR001108 (PI: A. Shekhar) funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Clinical and Translational Sciences Award. Dr. Kean was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (IK2RX000879). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veteran Affairs or the National Institutes of Health.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Minimally important difference
  • PHQ-9
  • PROMIS
  • Psychometrics

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this