MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-Restructured Form Validity Scales: Complementary Approaches to Evaluate Response Validity

James B. Hoelzle, Nathaniel W. Nelson, Paul A. Arbisi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Responsible forensic assessment is dependent on an appreciation for how validity scales differ from one another and function across different evaluation contexts. The primary goal of this review is to evaluate whether there is sufficient empirical support to provide expert testimony using MMPI-2 or MMPI-2-RF validity scales. Towards this goal, we briefly describe the development of MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF validity scales and review empirical studies that support interpretative strategies. We describe and illustrate with case examples how the respective sets of MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF validity scales utilize complementary strategies to detect over- and under-reporting of psychological, cognitive, and physical symptoms. Additionally, the review describes standards for expert psychological testimony and illustrates how MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF validity scales are particularly well suited to assess symptom validity and psychological status in secondary-gain settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-191
Number of pages18
JournalPsychological Injury and Law
Volume5
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Forensic psychology
  • MMPI-2
  • MMPI-2-RF
  • Symptom validity
  • Validity scales

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-Restructured Form Validity Scales: Complementary Approaches to Evaluate Response Validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this