TY - JOUR
T1 - Nursing interventions classification in systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms
T2 - A cross-mapping validation
AU - Park, Hyun Tae
AU - Lu, Der Fa
AU - Konicek, Debra
AU - Delaney, Connie
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - The Systemized Nomenclature of Medical Clinical Terms, or SNOMED-CT, was developed to create a comprehensive clinical healthcare reference terminology. Standardized nursing language concepts and terminologies recognized by the American Nurses Association have been added to SNOMED-CT and include the NANDA's Taxonomy II, NIC, NOC, the Omaha System, and CCC. The relationship link between terminologies and SNOMED-CT is provided in a mapping table, which identifies the source terminology. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the cross-mapping between the source system (NIC) and the target system (SNOMED-CT) using the methodology developed by Lu and colleagues to detect misassigned concepts. Knowledge representation concepts in the NIC and SNOMED-CT systems were compared using expert human judgment. Of 514 NIC concepts, 14 (2.7%) were identified as misassigned in SNOMED-CT. Two inappropriate representations of concepts were discovered in NIC. Results and recommendations were given to NIC and to SNOMED-CT.
AB - The Systemized Nomenclature of Medical Clinical Terms, or SNOMED-CT, was developed to create a comprehensive clinical healthcare reference terminology. Standardized nursing language concepts and terminologies recognized by the American Nurses Association have been added to SNOMED-CT and include the NANDA's Taxonomy II, NIC, NOC, the Omaha System, and CCC. The relationship link between terminologies and SNOMED-CT is provided in a mapping table, which identifies the source terminology. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the cross-mapping between the source system (NIC) and the target system (SNOMED-CT) using the methodology developed by Lu and colleagues to detect misassigned concepts. Knowledge representation concepts in the NIC and SNOMED-CT systems were compared using expert human judgment. Of 514 NIC concepts, 14 (2.7%) were identified as misassigned in SNOMED-CT. Two inappropriate representations of concepts were discovered in NIC. Results and recommendations were given to NIC and to SNOMED-CT.
KW - NIC
KW - Nursing interventions classification
KW - SNOMED-CT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547167872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547167872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.NCN.0000280590.35690.7d
DO - 10.1097/01.NCN.0000280590.35690.7d
M3 - Article
C2 - 17625400
AN - SCOPUS:34547167872
SN - 1538-2931
VL - 25
SP - 198
EP - 208
JO - CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing
JF - CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing
IS - 4
ER -