TY - JOUR
T1 - On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms
AU - Ehler, Eric D.
AU - Nelms, Benjamin E.
AU - Tomé, Wolfgang A.
PY - 2007/4/1
Y1 - 2007/4/1
N2 - Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09% to 0.15%, 0.23% to 3.14%, 1.14% to 5.51%, and 3.83% to 8.25% for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23% to 2.31%, 0.31% to 2.97%, and 0.7% to 4.67% for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.
AB - Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09% to 0.15%, 0.23% to 3.14%, 1.14% to 5.51%, and 3.83% to 8.25% for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23% to 2.31%, 0.31% to 2.97%, and 0.7% to 4.67% for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.
KW - 4D IMRT
KW - Gated IMRT delivery
KW - Gating
KW - Intrafraction motion
KW - Temporal dose uniformity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047271046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047271046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 17350124
AN - SCOPUS:34047271046
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 83
SP - 49
EP - 56
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -