On the measurement of inconsistency effects: Reply to Gleditsch

David R. Segal, David Knoke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gleditsch is correct in recognizing the problems of identification and measurement of inconsistency effects. He is incorrect in suggesting that we have ignored the warnings of scholars who have attempted to deal with these problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalSocial Forces
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1969
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the measurement of inconsistency effects: Reply to Gleditsch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this