Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

Jos J. Mellema; Wouter H. Mallee; Thierry G. Guitton; C. Niek van Dijk; David Ring; Job N. Doornberg; G. C. Babis; K. J. Jeray; M. J. Prayson; R. Pesantez; R. Acacio; D. O. Verbeek; P. Melvanki; B. E. Kreis; S. Mehta; S. Meylaerts; S. Wojtek; E. J. Yeap; H. Haapasalo; A. Kristan; C. Coles; J. L. Marsh; M. Mormino; M. Menon; M. Tyllianakis; P. Schandelmaier; R. J. Jenkinson; V. Neuhaus; C. M H Shahriar; W. D. Belangero; S. G. Kannan; G. M. Leonidovich; J. H. Davenport; K. Kabir; P. L. Althausen; Y. Weil; A. Toom; D. Sa da Costa; F. Lijoi; N. E. Koukoulias; N. Manidakis; M. van Den Bogaert; B. Patczai; A. Grauls; H. Kurup; M. P. van Den Bekerom; J. R. Lansdaal; M. Vale; P. Ousema; A. Barquet; B. J. Cross; H. Broekhuyse; D. Haverkamp; M. Merchant; E. Harvey; E. Stojkovska Pemovska; F. Frihagen; F. J. Seibert; C. Garnavos; H. van der Heide; H. A. Villamizar; I. Harris; L. C. Borris; O. Brink; P. R G Brink; P. Choudhari; M. Swiontkowski; T. Mittlmeier; T. Tosounidis; I. van Rensen; N. Martinelli; D. H. Park; N. Lasanianos; J. Vide; A. Engvall; R. D. Zura; A. Jubel; A. Kawaguchi; H. Goost; J. Bishop; L. Mica; M. Pirpiris; S. H. van Helden; S. Bouaicha; T. Schepers; T. Havliček; V. Giordano

doi:10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

Jos J. Mellema, Wouter H. Mallee, Thierry G. Guitton, C. Niek van Dijk, David Ring, Job N. Doornberg, G. C. Babis, K. J. Jeray, M. J. Prayson, R. Pesantez, R. Acacio, D. O. Verbeek, P. Melvanki, B. E. Kreis, S. Mehta, S. Meylaerts, S. Wojtek, E. J. Yeap, H. Haapasalo, A. KristanC. Coles, J. L. Marsh, M. Mormino, M. Menon, M. Tyllianakis, P. Schandelmaier, R. J. Jenkinson, V. Neuhaus, C. M H Shahriar, W. D. Belangero, S. G. Kannan, G. M. Leonidovich, J. H. Davenport, K. Kabir, P. L. Althausen, Y. Weil, A. Toom, D. Sa da Costa, F. Lijoi, N. E. Koukoulias, N. Manidakis, M. van Den Bogaert, B. Patczai, A. Grauls, H. Kurup, M. P. van Den Bekerom, J. R. Lansdaal, M. Vale, P. Ousema, A. Barquet, B. J. Cross, H. Broekhuyse, D. Haverkamp, M. Merchant, E. Harvey, E. Stojkovska Pemovska, F. Frihagen, F. J. Seibert, C. Garnavos, H. van der Heide, H. A. Villamizar, I. Harris, L. C. Borris, O. Brink, P. R G Brink, P. Choudhari, M. Swiontkowski, T. Mittlmeier, T. Tosounidis, I. van Rensen, N. Martinelli, D. H. Park, N. Lasanianos, J. Vide, A. Engvall, R. D. Zura, A. Jubel, A. Kawaguchi, H. Goost, J. Bishop, L. Mica, M. Pirpiris, S. H. van Helden, S. Bouaicha, T. Schepers, T. Havliček, V. Giordano

Orthopaedic Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the observer participation and satisfaction as well as interobserver reliability between two online platforms, Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and Traumaplatform Study Collaborative, for the evaluation of complex tibial plateau fractures using computed tomography in MPEG4 and DICOM format. A total of 143 observers started with the online evaluation of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures via either the SOVG or Traumaplatform Study Collaborative websites using MPEG4 videos or a DICOM viewer, respectively. Observers were asked to indicate the absence or presence of four tibial plateau fracture characteristics and to rate their satisfaction with the evaluation as provided by the respective online platforms. The observer participation rate was significantly higher in the SOVG (MPEG4 video) group compared to that in the Traumaplatform Study Collaborative (DICOM viewer) group (75 and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001). The median observer satisfaction with the online evaluation was seven (range, 0–10) using MPEG4 video compared to six (range, 1–9) using DICOM viewer (P = 0.11). The interobserver reliability for recognition of fracture characteristics in complex tibial plateau fractures was higher for the evaluation using MPEG4 video. In conclusion, observer participation and interobserver reliability for the characterization of tibial plateau fractures was greater with MPEG4 videos than with a standard DICOM viewer, while there was no difference in observer satisfaction. Future reliability studies should account for the method of delivering images.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	547-554
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Digital Imaging
Volume	30
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0
State	Published - Oct 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Keywords

Computed tomography
DICOM
MPEG
Orthopedic surgery
Tibial plateau fractures
Variation

Access

10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603427

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Mellema, J. J., Mallee, W. H., Guitton, T. G., van Dijk, C. N., Ring, D., Doornberg, J. N., Babis, G. C., Jeray, K. J., Prayson, M. J., Pesantez, R., Acacio, R., Verbeek, D. O., Melvanki, P., Kreis, B. E., Mehta, S., Meylaerts, S., Wojtek, S., Yeap, E. J., Haapasalo, H., ... Giordano, V. (2017). Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format. Journal of Digital Imaging, 30(5), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

Mellema, JJ, Mallee, WH, Guitton, TG, van Dijk, CN, Ring, D, Doornberg, JN, Babis, GC, Jeray, KJ, Prayson, MJ, Pesantez, R, Acacio, R, Verbeek, DO, Melvanki, P, Kreis, BE, Mehta, S, Meylaerts, S, Wojtek, S, Yeap, EJ, Haapasalo, H, Kristan, A, Coles, C, Marsh, JL, Mormino, M, Menon, M, Tyllianakis, M, Schandelmaier, P, Jenkinson, RJ, Neuhaus, V, Shahriar, CMH, Belangero, WD, Kannan, SG, Leonidovich, GM, Davenport, JH, Kabir, K, Althausen, PL, Weil, Y, Toom, A, Sa da Costa, D, Lijoi, F, Koukoulias, NE, Manidakis, N, van Den Bogaert, M, Patczai, B, Grauls, A, Kurup, H, van Den Bekerom, MP, Lansdaal, JR, Vale, M, Ousema, P, Barquet, A, Cross, BJ, Broekhuyse, H, Haverkamp, D, Merchant, M, Harvey, E, Pemovska, ES, Frihagen, F, Seibert, FJ, Garnavos, C, van der Heide, H, Villamizar, HA, Harris, I, Borris, LC, Brink, O, Brink, PRG, Choudhari, P, Swiontkowski, M, Mittlmeier, T, Tosounidis, T, van Rensen, I, Martinelli, N, Park, DH, Lasanianos, N, Vide, J, Engvall, A, Zura, RD, Jubel, A, Kawaguchi, A, Goost, H, Bishop, J, Mica, L, Pirpiris, M, van Helden, SH, Bouaicha, S, Schepers, T, Havliček, T & Giordano, V 2017, 'Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format', Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 547-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

@article{547cb18c4d3a435e8fbde0673bf8fd3b,

title = "Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the observer participation and satisfaction as well as interobserver reliability between two online platforms, Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and Traumaplatform Study Collaborative, for the evaluation of complex tibial plateau fractures using computed tomography in MPEG4 and DICOM format. A total of 143 observers started with the online evaluation of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures via either the SOVG or Traumaplatform Study Collaborative websites using MPEG4 videos or a DICOM viewer, respectively. Observers were asked to indicate the absence or presence of four tibial plateau fracture characteristics and to rate their satisfaction with the evaluation as provided by the respective online platforms. The observer participation rate was significantly higher in the SOVG (MPEG4 video) group compared to that in the Traumaplatform Study Collaborative (DICOM viewer) group (75 and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001). The median observer satisfaction with the online evaluation was seven (range, 0–10) using MPEG4 video compared to six (range, 1–9) using DICOM viewer (P = 0.11). The interobserver reliability for recognition of fracture characteristics in complex tibial plateau fractures was higher for the evaluation using MPEG4 video. In conclusion, observer participation and interobserver reliability for the characterization of tibial plateau fractures was greater with MPEG4 videos than with a standard DICOM viewer, while there was no difference in observer satisfaction. Future reliability studies should account for the method of delivering images.",

keywords = "Computed tomography, DICOM, MPEG, Orthopedic surgery, Tibial plateau fractures, Variation",

author = "Mellema, {Jos J.} and Mallee, {Wouter H.} and Guitton, {Thierry G.} and {van Dijk}, {C. Niek} and David Ring and Doornberg, {Job N.} and Babis, {G. C.} and Jeray, {K. J.} and Prayson, {M. J.} and R. Pesantez and R. Acacio and Verbeek, {D. O.} and P. Melvanki and Kreis, {B. E.} and S. Mehta and S. Meylaerts and S. Wojtek and Yeap, {E. J.} and H. Haapasalo and A. Kristan and C. Coles and Marsh, {J. L.} and M. Mormino and M. Menon and M. Tyllianakis and P. Schandelmaier and Jenkinson, {R. J.} and V. Neuhaus and Shahriar, {C. M H} and Belangero, {W. D.} and Kannan, {S. G.} and Leonidovich, {G. M.} and Davenport, {J. H.} and K. Kabir and Althausen, {P. L.} and Y. Weil and A. Toom and {Sa da Costa}, D. and F. Lijoi and Koukoulias, {N. E.} and N. Manidakis and {van Den Bogaert}, M. and B. Patczai and A. Grauls and H. Kurup and {van Den Bekerom}, {M. P.} and Lansdaal, {J. R.} and M. Vale and P. Ousema and A. Barquet and Cross, {B. J.} and H. Broekhuyse and D. Haverkamp and M. Merchant and E. Harvey and Pemovska, {E. Stojkovska} and F. Frihagen and Seibert, {F. J.} and C. Garnavos and {van der Heide}, H. and Villamizar, {H. A.} and I. Harris and Borris, {L. C.} and O. Brink and Brink, {P. R G} and P. Choudhari and M. Swiontkowski and T. Mittlmeier and T. Tosounidis and {van Rensen}, I. and N. Martinelli and Park, {D. H.} and N. Lasanianos and J. Vide and A. Engvall and Zura, {R. D.} and A. Jubel and A. Kawaguchi and H. Goost and J. Bishop and L. Mica and M. Pirpiris and {van Helden}, {S. H.} and S. Bouaicha and T. Schepers and T. Havli{\v c}ek and V. Giordano",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "30",

pages = "547--554",

journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",

issn = "0897-1889",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery

T2 - Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

AU - Mellema, Jos J.

AU - Mallee, Wouter H.

AU - Guitton, Thierry G.

AU - van Dijk, C. Niek

AU - Ring, David

AU - Doornberg, Job N.

AU - Babis, G. C.

AU - Jeray, K. J.

AU - Prayson, M. J.

AU - Pesantez, R.

AU - Acacio, R.

AU - Verbeek, D. O.

AU - Melvanki, P.

AU - Kreis, B. E.

AU - Mehta, S.

AU - Meylaerts, S.

AU - Wojtek, S.

AU - Yeap, E. J.

AU - Haapasalo, H.

AU - Kristan, A.

AU - Coles, C.

AU - Marsh, J. L.

AU - Mormino, M.

AU - Menon, M.

AU - Tyllianakis, M.

AU - Schandelmaier, P.

AU - Jenkinson, R. J.

AU - Neuhaus, V.

AU - Shahriar, C. M H

AU - Belangero, W. D.

AU - Kannan, S. G.

AU - Leonidovich, G. M.

AU - Davenport, J. H.

AU - Kabir, K.

AU - Althausen, P. L.

AU - Weil, Y.

AU - Toom, A.

AU - Sa da Costa, D.

AU - Lijoi, F.

AU - Koukoulias, N. E.

AU - Manidakis, N.

AU - van Den Bogaert, M.

AU - Patczai, B.

AU - Grauls, A.

AU - Kurup, H.

AU - van Den Bekerom, M. P.

AU - Lansdaal, J. R.

AU - Vale, M.

AU - Ousema, P.

AU - Barquet, A.

AU - Cross, B. J.

AU - Broekhuyse, H.

AU - Haverkamp, D.

AU - Merchant, M.

AU - Harvey, E.

AU - Pemovska, E. Stojkovska

AU - Frihagen, F.

AU - Seibert, F. J.

AU - Garnavos, C.

AU - van der Heide, H.

AU - Villamizar, H. A.

AU - Harris, I.

AU - Borris, L. C.

AU - Brink, O.

AU - Brink, P. R G

AU - Choudhari, P.

AU - Swiontkowski, M.

AU - Mittlmeier, T.

AU - Tosounidis, T.

AU - van Rensen, I.

AU - Martinelli, N.

AU - Park, D. H.

AU - Lasanianos, N.

AU - Vide, J.

AU - Engvall, A.

AU - Zura, R. D.

AU - Jubel, A.

AU - Kawaguchi, A.

AU - Goost, H.

AU - Bishop, J.

AU - Mica, L.

AU - Pirpiris, M.

AU - van Helden, S. H.

AU - Bouaicha, S.

AU - Schepers, T.

AU - Havliček, T.

AU - Giordano, V.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the observer participation and satisfaction as well as interobserver reliability between two online platforms, Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and Traumaplatform Study Collaborative, for the evaluation of complex tibial plateau fractures using computed tomography in MPEG4 and DICOM format. A total of 143 observers started with the online evaluation of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures via either the SOVG or Traumaplatform Study Collaborative websites using MPEG4 videos or a DICOM viewer, respectively. Observers were asked to indicate the absence or presence of four tibial plateau fracture characteristics and to rate their satisfaction with the evaluation as provided by the respective online platforms. The observer participation rate was significantly higher in the SOVG (MPEG4 video) group compared to that in the Traumaplatform Study Collaborative (DICOM viewer) group (75 and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001). The median observer satisfaction with the online evaluation was seven (range, 0–10) using MPEG4 video compared to six (range, 1–9) using DICOM viewer (P = 0.11). The interobserver reliability for recognition of fracture characteristics in complex tibial plateau fractures was higher for the evaluation using MPEG4 video. In conclusion, observer participation and interobserver reliability for the characterization of tibial plateau fractures was greater with MPEG4 videos than with a standard DICOM viewer, while there was no difference in observer satisfaction. Future reliability studies should account for the method of delivering images.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the observer participation and satisfaction as well as interobserver reliability between two online platforms, Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and Traumaplatform Study Collaborative, for the evaluation of complex tibial plateau fractures using computed tomography in MPEG4 and DICOM format. A total of 143 observers started with the online evaluation of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures via either the SOVG or Traumaplatform Study Collaborative websites using MPEG4 videos or a DICOM viewer, respectively. Observers were asked to indicate the absence or presence of four tibial plateau fracture characteristics and to rate their satisfaction with the evaluation as provided by the respective online platforms. The observer participation rate was significantly higher in the SOVG (MPEG4 video) group compared to that in the Traumaplatform Study Collaborative (DICOM viewer) group (75 and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001). The median observer satisfaction with the online evaluation was seven (range, 0–10) using MPEG4 video compared to six (range, 1–9) using DICOM viewer (P = 0.11). The interobserver reliability for recognition of fracture characteristics in complex tibial plateau fractures was higher for the evaluation using MPEG4 video. In conclusion, observer participation and interobserver reliability for the characterization of tibial plateau fractures was greater with MPEG4 videos than with a standard DICOM viewer, while there was no difference in observer satisfaction. Future reliability studies should account for the method of delivering images.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - DICOM

KW - MPEG

KW - Orthopedic surgery

KW - Tibial plateau fractures

KW - Variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010815549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010815549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

DO - 10.1007/s10278-016-9939-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 28120143

AN - SCOPUS:85010815549

SN - 0897-1889

VL - 30

SP - 547

EP - 554

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

IS - 5

ER -

Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this