Operative Repair of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury Versus Knee Brace in Children With an Acute First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Marie Askenberger, Eva Bengtsson Moström, Wilhelmina Ekström, Elizabeth A Arendt, Anna Hellsten, Christina Mikkelsen, Per Mats Janarv

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: A lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is the most common traumatic knee injury with hemarthrosis in children. The redislocation rate is high. Varying operative and nonoperative treatments have been advocated with no consensus on the best treatment. Purpose: (1) To evaluate if arthroscopic-assisted repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in patients with an acute first-time traumatic LPD would reduce the recurrence rate and offer better objective/subjective knee function compared with a knee brace without repair. (2) To study the presence of anatomic patellar instability risk factors (APIFs) and their association with a redislocation. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This was a prospective series of 74 skeletally immature patients aged 9 to 14 years (38 girls and 36 boys; mean age, 13.1 years) with a first-time traumatic LPD, with clinical examinations, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic arthroscopic surgery performed within 2 weeks of the index injury. The child was randomized to either (1) a knee brace (KB group) for 4 weeks and physical therapy or (2) arthroscopic-assisted repair (R group) of the MPFL with anchors, 4 weeks with a soft cast splint, and physical therapy. The follow-up time was 2 years. Results: The redislocation rate was significantly lower in the R group than in the KB group at final follow-up: 8 patients (22%) versus 16 patients (43%), respectively (P =.047). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for children sport/play and quality of life subscales had lower scores in the R group compared with the KB group; the significant differences were among those with redislocations. The mean Kujala score was excellent in the KB group (95.9) and good in the R group (90.9). An impaired Limb Symmetry Index (median, 83%) for concentric quadriceps torque at 90 deg/s was found only in the R group. Eighty-one percent of the study patients had ≥2 APIFs. Trochlear dysplasia (trochlear depth <3 mm) had the highest odds ratio for redislocations (2.35 [95% CI, 0.69-8.03]), with no significant association between APIFs and a redislocation. Conclusion: Operative repair of an MPFL injury in the acute phase in skeletally immature children with a primary traumatic LPD significantly reduced the redislocation rate but did not improve subjective or objective knee function compared with a knee brace without repair. The majority of the patients in both groups were satisfied with their knee function. There was a high representation of APIFs, which needs to be considered when evaluating the risk of redislocations. Registration: ISRCTN 39959729 (Current Controlled Trials).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2328-2340
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Keywords

  • MPFL repair
  • children
  • knee
  • knee brace
  • medial patellofemoral ligament
  • patellar dislocation
  • pediatric sports medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Operative Repair of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury Versus Knee Brace in Children With an Acute First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this