Oral arguments and coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: A deliberate dialogue

Ryan C. Black, Timothy R. Johnson, Justin Wedeking

Research output: Book/ReportBook

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court, with its controlled, highly institutionalized decision-making practices, provides an ideal environment for studying coalition formation. The process begins during the oral argument stage, which provides the justices with their first opportunity to hear one another's attitudes and concerns specific to a case. This information gathering allows them eventually to form a coalition. In order to uncover the workings of this process, the authors analyze oral argument transcripts from every case decided from 1998 through 2007 as well as the complete collection of notes kept during oral arguments by Justice Lewis F. Powell and Justice Harry A. Blackmun. Both justices clearly monitored their fellow justices' participation in the discussion and used their observations to craft opinions their colleagues would be likely to support. This study represents a major step forward in the understanding of coalition formation, which is a crucial aspect of many areas of political debate and decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Place of PublicationAnn Arbor, MI
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Press
Number of pages141
ISBN (Print)9780472118465
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Oral arguments and coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: A deliberate dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this