Outcome instruments: Rationale for their use

Rudolf W. Poolman, Marc F. Swiontkowski, Jeremy C T Fairbank, Emil H. Schemitsch, Sheila Sprague, Henrica C W De Vet

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

The number of outcome instruments available for use in orthopaedic observational studies has increased dramatically in recent years. Properly developed and tested outcome instruments provide a very useful tool for orthopaedic research. Criteria have been proposed to assess the measurement properties and quality of health-status instruments. Unfortunately, not all instruments are developed with use of strict quality criteria. In this article, we discuss these quality criteria and provide the reader with a tool to help select the most appropriate instrument for use in an observational study. We also review the steps for future use of outcome instruments, including the standardization of their use in orthopaedic research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-49
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume91
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome instruments: Rationale for their use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this