Parochialism in U.S. sentencing policy

Michael Tonry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The import/export trade in sentencing and corrections innovations between the United States and Europe is unbalanced. Humane, cost-effective sanctions such as prosecutorial fines, community service orders, and day fines have proliferated across national boundaries in Europe, but U.S. borders have proved impermeable. By contrast, American symbolic policies and rhetoric (e.g., three strikes, boot camps, truth in sentencing) have been adopted in mild forms in some English-speaking countries, but other European countries have shown no interest. The European focus on effectiveness, moderation, and humanity results in large part from constitutional arrangements that insulate sentencing and corrections policies from partisan and populist politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-65
Number of pages18
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parochialism in U.S. sentencing policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this