Abstract
Drawing upon qualitative data gathered during protests at the 2008 Republican
National Convention, secondary sources of Black Lives Matter, and Trump and anti-
Trump rallies, I examine the collective interests, ideology, and role performances of
a seldom studied group involved in demonstrations—“peacekeepers.” My findings
suggest that as members of this group attempt to create a peaceful order between
police and protesters on the street, their activities are marked by a unique set of
contradictions. These contradictions emerge as a result of two primary roles—
those of crisis workers and “human involvement shields”—performed by peacekeepers,
as they attempt to build and leverage credibility with both protesters and
police. I theorize this process by outlining phases of interaction—milling, miming, and
crossing—between peacekeepers and these groups once peacekeepers are out on
the street.
National Convention, secondary sources of Black Lives Matter, and Trump and anti-
Trump rallies, I examine the collective interests, ideology, and role performances of
a seldom studied group involved in demonstrations—“peacekeepers.” My findings
suggest that as members of this group attempt to create a peaceful order between
police and protesters on the street, their activities are marked by a unique set of
contradictions. These contradictions emerge as a result of two primary roles—
those of crisis workers and “human involvement shields”—performed by peacekeepers,
as they attempt to build and leverage credibility with both protesters and
police. I theorize this process by outlining phases of interaction—milling, miming, and
crossing—between peacekeepers and these groups once peacekeepers are out on
the street.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-28 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Humanity and Society |
Early online date | Dec 23 2017 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 23 2017 |
Keywords
- peacekeepers, police, conflict management, protesters, mass demonstrations