Personnel selection

Paul R. Sackett, Filip Lievens

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

197 Scopus citations

Abstract

We review developments in personnel selection since the previous review by Hough & Oswald (2000) in the Annual Review of Psychology. We organize the review around a taxonomic structure of possible bases for improved selection, which includes (a) better understanding of the criterion domain and criterion measurement, (b) improved measurement of existing predictor methods or constructs, (c) identification and measurement of new predictor methods or constructs, (d) improved identification of features that moderate or mediate predictor-criterion relationships, (e) clearer understanding of the relationship between predictors or between predictors and criteria (e.g., via meta-analytic synthesis), (f) identification and prediction of new outcome variables, (g) improved ability to determine how well we predict the outcomes of interest, (h) improved understanding of subgroup differences, fairness, bias, and the legal defensibility, (i ) improved administrative ease with which selection systems can be used, (j) improved insight into applicant reactions, and (k) improved decision-maker acceptance of selection systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAnnual Review of Psychology
EditorsSusan Fiske, Daniel Schacter, Robert Sternberg
Pages419-450
Number of pages32
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Publication series

NameAnnual Review of Psychology
Volume59
ISSN (Print)0066-4308

Keywords

  • Ability
  • Adverse impact
  • Job performance
  • Personality
  • Testing
  • Validity

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Personnel selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this