Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: The epigenetic perspective

Albert H.C. Wong, Irving I. Gottesman, Arturas Petronis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

279 Scopus citations

Abstract

Human monozygotic twins and other genetically identical organisms are almost always strikingly similar in appearance, yet they are often discordant for important phenotypes including complex diseases. Such variation among organisms with virtually identical chromosomal DNA sequences has largely been attributed to the effects of environment. Environmental factors can have a strong effect on some phenotypes, but evidence from both animal and human experiments suggests that the impact of environment has been overstated and that our views on the causes of phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms require revision. New theoretical and experimental opportunities arise if epigenetic factors are considered as part of the molecular control of phenotype. Epigenetic mechanisms may explain paradoxical findings in twin and inbred animal studies when phenotypic differences occur in the absence of observable environmental differences and also when environmental differences do not significantly increase the degree of phenotypic variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R11-R18
JournalHuman molecular genetics
Volume14
Issue numberSPEC. ISS. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2005

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Dr Axel Schumacher for his help with drawing figures for this article. This research has been supported by the Special Initiative grant from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and also by NARSAD, the Canadian Psychiatric Research Foundation, the Stanley Foundation, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada to A.P.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: The epigenetic perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this