Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating

Eric Finkelstein, Simone French, Jayachandran N. Variyam, Pamela S. Haines

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

The increased prevalence and costs associated with the obesity epidemic have made preventive efforts a public health priority. Public health has historically relied on a series of targeted regulations, taxes, and education efforts to curb epidemics, and will rely on similar strategies to combat obesity. We argue that interventions targeted at youth are relatively easy to justify on economic grounds due to the additional protections that this group requires, but that justification for government interventions aimed at curbing obesity among adults requires additional evidence that private markets are not functioning properly. We then present seven proposed intervention strategies to promote healthy eating, and use an economic framework to discuss the relative merits of the interventions. This evaluation will allow policymakers to make more informed decisions concerning the relative merits of these strategies in combating the obesity epidemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-171
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of preventive medicine
Volume27
Issue number3 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this