Prospective and Retrospective Evaluation of the Performance of the FDA-Approved Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC Assay

Sophie S Arbefeville, Elizabeth Thonen-Kerr, Patricia Ferrieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of respiratory viruses is important in patient care and in guiding therapy and infection prevention policy. Rapid viral antigen assays are simple to perform and provide results within 15 to 30 minutes but are limited by their modest-to-moderate sensitivity. Molecular assays are more sensitive and specific but require more technical time and expertise and are more expensive. We verified the performance of the Xpert Flu/RSV XC assay prospectively, using patient respiratory samples from the 2014–2015 respiratory season, and, retrospectively, with frozen patient samples from the previous respiratory season. A total of 60 specimens were assayed on the Xpert Flu/RSV XC assay and by the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel. The sensitivity of the Xpert Flu/RSV XC for Flu A was 100% (23/23), for Flu B, 80% (8/10), and for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), 94.1% (16/17), compared to the reference assay (GenMark). The specificity was 100%. Eight specimens were positive for viruses other than Flu A/B or RSV, and this did not interfere with detection of targets in the Xpert assay. We demonstrated that the performance of the Xpert Flu/RSV XC was comparable to the more comprehensive molecular respiratory assay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E53-E56
JournalLab Medicine
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Clinical Pathology 2017. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Flu A
  • Flu B
  • RSV
  • Rapid molecular testing
  • Respiratory virus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective and Retrospective Evaluation of the Performance of the FDA-Approved Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC Assay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this