TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective Postimplementation Study of Solana Group A Streptococcal Nucleic Acid Amplification Test vs Conventional Throat Culture
AU - Arbefeville, Sophie
AU - Nelson, Kari
AU - Thonen-Kerr, Elizabeth
AU - Ferrieri, Patricia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/8/30
Y1 - 2018/8/30
N2 - Objectives We evaluated the Solana Group A Streptococcus Assay (Quidel, San Diego, CA), a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), as a substitute for backup culture on throat specimens with a negative rapid group A Streptococcus (GAS) antigen assay. Methods During October 2016, all throat swabs from patients with a negative GAS antigen assay from local urgent care centers were processed by NAAT and conventional culture in real time. Results The overall agreement of the 2,090 tested throat swab specimens of the NAAT with the culture was 2,050 (98%) of 2,090. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.4%, 98.5%, 78.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions In summary, this postimplementation study supported high sensitivity and specificity of the GAS NAAT as a backup test for negative rapid GAS antigen tests.
AB - Objectives We evaluated the Solana Group A Streptococcus Assay (Quidel, San Diego, CA), a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), as a substitute for backup culture on throat specimens with a negative rapid group A Streptococcus (GAS) antigen assay. Methods During October 2016, all throat swabs from patients with a negative GAS antigen assay from local urgent care centers were processed by NAAT and conventional culture in real time. Results The overall agreement of the 2,090 tested throat swab specimens of the NAAT with the culture was 2,050 (98%) of 2,090. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.4%, 98.5%, 78.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. Conclusions In summary, this postimplementation study supported high sensitivity and specificity of the GAS NAAT as a backup test for negative rapid GAS antigen tests.
KW - Group A Streptococcus
KW - Pharyngitis
KW - Rapid antigen detection test
KW - Throat culture
KW - ucleic acid amplification test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054564586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054564586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ajcp/aqy051
DO - 10.1093/ajcp/aqy051
M3 - Article
C2 - 29982326
AN - SCOPUS:85054564586
VL - 150
SP - 333
EP - 337
JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
SN - 0002-9173
IS - 4
ER -