Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Branden Duffey, Briony Varda, Badrinath Konety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has gained widespread acceptance in the treatment of prostate cancer. While it increasingly is becoming the surgical approach of choice in many centers, limited data exist directly comparing it to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). This review examines the evidence comparing RALP to RRP. The outcomes evaluated are arranged into perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes. Of the 21 publications meeting our selection criteria, Level II, III, and IV evidence were found in 9, 1, and 11 articles, respectively. Overall, RALP was associated with lower blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, and higher cost when compared to RRP. Definitive conclusions regarding complications and oncologic and functional outcomes are not yet possible, and will require longer-term follow-up and well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-236
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Urology Reports
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Prostate neoplasm
  • Prostatectomy
  • Robotics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this