Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: Implications for cost-effective study designs

Giorgio Pistis, Eleonora Porcu, Scott I. Vrieze, Carlo Sidore, Maristella Steri, Fabrice Danjou, Fabio Busonero, Antonella Mulas, Magdalena Zoledziewska, Andrea Maschio, Christine Brennan, Sandra Lai, Michael B. Miller, Marco Marcelli, Maria Francesca Urru, Maristella Pitzalis, Robert H. Lyons, Hyun M. Kang, Chris M. Jones, Andrea AngiusWilliam G. Iacono, David Schlessinger, Matt McGue, Francesco Cucca, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Serena Sanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

The utility of genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies is increasing as progressively larger reference panels are improved and expanded through whole-genome sequencing. Developing general guidelines for optimally cost-effective imputation, however, requires evaluation of performance issues that include the relative utility of study-specific compared with general/multipopulation reference panels; genotyping with various array scaffolds; effects of different ethnic backgrounds; and assessment of ranges of allele frequencies. Here we compared the effectiveness of study-specific reference panels to the commonly used 1000 Genomes Project (1000G) reference panels in the isolated Sardinian population and in cohorts of European ancestry including samples from Minnesota (USA). We also examined different combinations of genome-wide and custom arrays for baseline genotypes. In Sardinians, the study-specific reference panel provided better coverage and genotype imputation accuracy than the 1000G panels and other large European panels. In fact, even gene-centered custom arrays (interrogating ∼200 000 variants) provided highly informative content across the entire genome. Gain in accuracy was also observed for Minnesotans using the study-specific reference panel, although the increase was smaller than in Sardinians, especially for rare variants. Notably, a combined panel including both study-specific and 1000G reference panels improved imputation accuracy only in the Minnesota sample, and only at rare sites. Finally, we found that when imputation is performed with a study-specific reference panel, cutoffs different from the standard thresholds of MACH-Rsq and IMPUTE-INFO metrics should be used to efficiently filter badly imputed rare variants. This study thus provides general guidelines for researchers planning large-scale genetic studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)975-983
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 12 2015

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Health, National Institute on Aging (N01-AG-1-2109 and HHSN271201100005C), National Human Genome Research Institute grants (HG005581, HG005552, HG006513 and HG007022 to GRA), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 024417 and DA 034606) and the Italian FISM (2011/R/13 to FC). We thank Frederic Reinier, Riccardo Berutti, Rossano Atzeni, Goo Jun, Alan Kwong, Maria Valentini, Roberto Cusano, Manuela Oppo, Rosella Pilu and Brendan Tarrier for additional help on generating and managing sequencing data; Mariano Dei, Monia Lobina and Francesca Deidda for sample preparation; and Lidia Leoni, Carlo Podda and Antonio Concas for their technical support on the high-performance computing cluster at CRS4.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: Implications for cost-effective study designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this