Reaction of barley seedlings with different stem rust resistance genes to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici and Puccinia graminis f. sp. secalis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Seedling tests are desirable for disease resistance screening in breeding programs because a large number of lines can be evaluated in a short period of time and with modest space requirements. This study was undertaken to identify pathotypes of the wheat stem rust pathogen (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) and cultures of the rye stem rust pathogen (Puccinia graminis f. sp. secalis) that might be useful for detecting resistance genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare) at the seedling stage. Barley accessions with different resistance genes (Rpg1, Rpg2, Rpg3, rpg4, and rpgBH) were assessed for their infection types (ITs) to 13 pathotypes of P. graminis f. sp. tritici and two cultures of P. graminis f. sp. secalis at two temperature regimes (18–21 °C and 24–25 °C). The P. graminis f. sp. tritici pathotypes HKHJ and QCCJ were effective for specifically detecting Rpg1 and rpg4, respectively, and will facilitate resistance breeding efforts. No cultures were found to be effective for specifically detecting the resistance of Hietpas-5, PI 382313, or Black Hulless at the seedling stage. Some pathotypes or cultures did, however, produce low ITs on these sources and will therefore be useful for genetic studies involving crosses with susceptible barleys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-89
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank A.P. Roelfs and J.D. Miller for providing the rust cultures used in this study. This research was supported in part by the American Malting Barley Association.

Keywords

  • Disease resistance
  • Hordeum vulgare
  • Rye stem rust
  • Wheat stem rust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reaction of barley seedlings with different stem rust resistance genes to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici and Puccinia graminis f. sp. secalis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this