Remarks on control design with degree constraint

Tryphon T. Georgiou; Anders Lindquist

doi:10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

Remarks on control design with degree constraint

Tryphon T. Georgiou, Anders Lindquist

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to highlight similarities and differences between two alternative methodologies for feedback control design under constraints on the McMillan degree of the feedback system. Both sets of techniques focus on uniformly optimal designs. The first is based on the work of Gahinet and Apkarian and that of Skelton et al., while the other is based on earlier joint work of the authors with C. I. Byrnes.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1150-1156
Number of pages	7
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Volume	51
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2006.878751
State	Published - Jul 2006

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 14, 2005; revised December 2, 2005. Recommended by Associate Editor M. Kothare. This work was supported by grants from the AFOSR, the NSF, VR, and the Göran Gustafsson Foundation. T. T. Georgiou is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA (e-mail: tryphon@ece.umn.edu). A. Lindquist is with the Department of Mathematics, Division of Optimization and Systems Theory, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: alq@math.kth.se). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

Keywords

H control
Linear matrix inequalities (LMIs)
McMillan degree constraint
Weighted entropy

Access

10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{67951d2e5c9a434e826325ed3ccfc6c4,

title = "Remarks on control design with degree constraint",

abstract = "The purpose of this note is to highlight similarities and differences between two alternative methodologies for feedback control design under constraints on the McMillan degree of the feedback system. Both sets of techniques focus on uniformly optimal designs. The first is based on the work of Gahinet and Apkarian and that of Skelton et al., while the other is based on earlier joint work of the authors with C. I. Byrnes.",

keywords = "H control, Linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), McMillan degree constraint, Weighted entropy",

author = "Georgiou, {Tryphon T.} and Anders Lindquist",

note = "Funding Information: Manuscript received April 14, 2005; revised December 2, 2005. Recommended by Associate Editor M. Kothare. This work was supported by grants from the AFOSR, the NSF, VR, and the G{\"o}ran Gustafsson Foundation. T. T. Georgiou is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA (e-mail: tryphon@ece.umn.edu). A. Lindquist is with the Department of Mathematics, Division of Optimization and Systems Theory, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: alq@math.kth.se). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAC.2006.878751",

year = "2006",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1109/TAC.2006.878751",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "51",

pages = "1150--1156",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control",

issn = "0018-9286",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remarks on control design with degree constraint

AU - Georgiou, Tryphon T.

AU - Lindquist, Anders

N1 - Funding Information: Manuscript received April 14, 2005; revised December 2, 2005. Recommended by Associate Editor M. Kothare. This work was supported by grants from the AFOSR, the NSF, VR, and the Göran Gustafsson Foundation. T. T. Georgiou is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA (e-mail: tryphon@ece.umn.edu). A. Lindquist is with the Department of Mathematics, Division of Optimization and Systems Theory, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: alq@math.kth.se). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - The purpose of this note is to highlight similarities and differences between two alternative methodologies for feedback control design under constraints on the McMillan degree of the feedback system. Both sets of techniques focus on uniformly optimal designs. The first is based on the work of Gahinet and Apkarian and that of Skelton et al., while the other is based on earlier joint work of the authors with C. I. Byrnes.

AB - The purpose of this note is to highlight similarities and differences between two alternative methodologies for feedback control design under constraints on the McMillan degree of the feedback system. Both sets of techniques focus on uniformly optimal designs. The first is based on the work of Gahinet and Apkarian and that of Skelton et al., while the other is based on earlier joint work of the authors with C. I. Byrnes.

KW - H control

KW - Linear matrix inequalities (LMIs)

KW - McMillan degree constraint

KW - Weighted entropy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746047115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746047115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

DO - 10.1109/TAC.2006.878751

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746047115

SN - 0018-9286

VL - 51

SP - 1150

EP - 1156

JO - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

JF - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

IS - 7

ER -

Remarks on control design with degree constraint

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this