Repression of multiple myeloma growth and preservation of bone with combined radiotherapy and anti-angiogenic agent

Dan Jia, Nathan A. Koonce, Roopa Halakatti, Xin Li, Shmuel Yaccoby, Frances L. Swain, Larry J. Suva, Leah Hennings, Marc S. Berridge, Scott M. Apana, Kevin Mayo, Peter M. Corry, Robert J. Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effects of ionizing radiation, with or without the anti-angiogenic agent anginex (Ax), on multiple myeloma growth were tested in a SCID-rab mouse model. Mice carrying human multiple myeloma cell-containing pre-implanted bone grafts were treated weekly with various regimens for 8 weeks. Rapid multiple myeloma growth, assessed by bioluminescence intensity (IVIS), human lambda Ig light chain level in serum (ELISA), and the volume of bone grafts (caliper), was observed in untreated mice. Tumor burden in mice receiving combined therapy was reduced to 59 (by caliper), 43 (by ELISA), and 2 (by IVIS) of baseline values after 8 weeks of treatment. Ax or radiation alone slowed but did not stop tumor growth. Four weeks after the withdrawal of the treatments, tumor burden remained minimal in mice given Ax radiation but increased noticeably in the other three groups. Multiple myeloma suppression by Ax radiation was accompanied by a marked decrease in the number and activity of osteoclasts in bone grafts assessed by histology. Bone graft integrity was preserved by Ax radiation but was lost in the other three groups, as assessed by microCT imaging and radiography. These results suggest that radiotherapy, when primed by anti-angiogenic agents, may be a potent therapy for focal multiple myeloma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)809-817
Number of pages9
JournalRadiation research
Volume173
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repression of multiple myeloma growth and preservation of bone with combined radiotherapy and anti-angiogenic agent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this