Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”

Peter B. Reich; Sarah E. Hobbie; Tali D. Lee; Melissa A. Pastore

doi:10.1126/science.aau1300

Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C₃ versus C₄ grass response to elevated CO₂ during a 20-year field experiment”

Peter B. Reich, Sarah E. Hobbie, Tali D. Lee, Melissa A. Pastore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C₃-C₄ grass responses to elevated CO₂. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO₂ based on C₃-C₄ differences in photosynthetic pathway.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	eaau1300
Journal	Science
Volume	361
Issue number	6402
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau1300
State	Published - Aug 10 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author.

Access

10.1126/science.aau1300

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{ebcb8f10796e42188528b896d58686c8,

title = "Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”",

abstract = "Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C3-C4 grass responses to elevated CO2. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO2 based on C3-C4 differences in photosynthetic pathway.",

author = "Reich, {Peter B.} and Hobbie, {Sarah E.} and Lee, {Tali D.} and Pastore, {Melissa A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Author.",

year = "2018",

month = aug,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1126/science.aau1300",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "361",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6402",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”

AU - Reich, Peter B.

AU - Hobbie, Sarah E.

AU - Lee, Tali D.

AU - Pastore, Melissa A.

PY - 2018/8/10

Y1 - 2018/8/10

N2 - Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C3-C4 grass responses to elevated CO2. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO2 based on C3-C4 differences in photosynthetic pathway.

AB - Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C3-C4 grass responses to elevated CO2. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO2 based on C3-C4 differences in photosynthetic pathway.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051366995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051366995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.aau1300

DO - 10.1126/science.aau1300

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30093575

AN - SCOPUS:85051366995

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 361

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6402

M1 - eaau1300

ER -