Risk segmentation: Goal or problem?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations


This paper traces the evolution of economists' views about risk segmentation in health insurance markets. Originally seen as a desirable goal, risk segmentation has come to be viewed as leading to abnormal profits, wasted resources, and inefficient limitations on coverage and services. We suggest that risk segmentation may be efficient if one takes an ex post view (i.e., after consumers' risks are known). From this perspective, managed care may be a much better method for achieving risk segmentation than limitations on coverage. The most serious objection to risk segmentation is the ex ante concern that it undermines long-term insurance contracts that would protect consumers against changes in lifetime risk. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-512
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2000


Dive into the research topics of 'Risk segmentation: Goal or problem?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this