Safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the feline pancreas: a case-control study

Sarah K. Crain, Leslie C. Sharkey, Amy P. Cordner, Christina Knudson, P. Jane Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The safety of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the feline pancreas has not been reported. The incidence of complications following ultrasound-guided pancreatic FNA in 73 cats (pancreatic aspirate [PA] cats) with clinical and ultrasonographic evidence of pancreatic disease was compared with complications in two groups of matched control cats also diagnosed with pancreatic disease that either had abdominal organs other than the pancreas aspirated (control FNA, n = 63) or no aspirates performed (control no FNA, n = 61). The complication rate within 48 h of the ultrasound and/or aspirate procedure did not differ among the PA cats (11%), control FNA (14%) or control no FNA (8%) cats. There was no difference in rate of survival to discharge (82%, 84% and 83%, respectively) or length of hospital stay among groups. The cytologic recovery rate for the pancreatic samples was 67%. Correlation with histopathology, available in seven cases, was 86%. Pancreatic FNA in cats is a safe procedure requiring further investigation to establish diagnostic value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)858-863
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, © ISFM and AAFP 2014.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the feline pancreas: a case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this