Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1236
JournalPharmacy Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Grupo de Investigacion en Atencion Farmaceutica. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Open access publishing
  • Peer review
  • Periodicals as topic
  • Research

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this