Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stephen Hawking, among others, has proposed that the topological stability of a property of space-time is a necessary condition for it to be physically significant. What counts as stable, however, depends crucially on the choice of topology. Some physicists have thus suggested that one should find a canonical topology, a single 'right' topology for every inquiry. While certain such choices might be initially motivated, some little-discussed examples of Robert Geroch and some propositions of my own show that the main candidates - and each possible choice, to some extent - faces the horns of a no-go result. I suggest that instead of trying to decide what the 'right' topology is for all problems, one should let the details of particular types of problems guide the choice of an appropriate topology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-389
Number of pages25
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Similarity, Topology, and Physical Significance in Relativity Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this