Single-payer, health savings accounts, or managed care? Minnesota physicians' perspectives.

Joel M. Albers, Breanna Peterson Lathrop, Kirk C. Allison, Charles N. Oberg, James F. Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The United States is facing a health care crisis with the number of uninsured Americans exceeding 46 million and health care premiums and overall costs increasing at 3 to 4 times the rate of inflation. Proposed solutions include continuing managed care, moving to a single-payer financing system with universal coverage, and replacing traditional health plans with high-deductible policies that allow patients to draw from health savings accounts (HSAs) to pay out-of-pocket costs. Despite physicians' vital role in health care, few studies have assessed their preferences regarding health care financing systems. We surveyed a random sample of licensed Minnesota physicians to determine their preferences regarding health care financing systems. Of 390 physicians, 64% favored a single-payer system, 25% HSAs, and 12% managed care. The majority of physicians (86%) also agreed that it is the responsibility of society, through the government, to ensure that everyone has access to good medical care. Less than half (41%) said that the private insurance industry should continue to play a major role in financing health care. The accumulating knowledge about physicians' preferences for various health care financing mechanisms merits widespread inclusion in policy debates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-40
Number of pages5
JournalMinnesota medicine
Volume90
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single-payer, health savings accounts, or managed care? Minnesota physicians' perspectives.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this