Smokeless tobacco abstinence effects and nicotine gum dose

Dorothy Hatsukami, Deborah Anton, Robert Keenan, Allan Callies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

There were two experiments on abstinence from smokeless tobacco. The purpose of the first experiment was to determine abstinence effects from smokeless tobacco. The purpose of the second experiment was to examine the effects of different doses of nicotine gum on smokeless tobacco abstinence effects. The subjects were male Copenhagen smokeless tobacco users who underwent 3 days of baseline measurement while continuing to use smokeless tobacco ad libitum, and 5 days of the experimental condition. In the first experiment, the subjects were assigned randomly to one of two groups and compared: continuous smokeless tobacco users (n=10), and deprivation plus no nicotine gum (n=10). In the second experiment, subjects were assigned randomly and in a double-blind fashion to one of three groups and compared: (1) deprivation plus 0 mg nicotine gum (n=20); (2) deprivation plus 2 mg nicotine gum (n=20); and (3) deprivation plus 4 mg nicotine gum (n=20). The first experiment showed significant increases upon abstinence for the following variables: (1) craving; (2) difficulty concentrating; (3) restlessness; (4) excessive hunger; (5) eating; (6) reaction time; (7) variability of reaction time and (8) total withdrawal scores for both the self-rated and the observer-rated forms. The second experiment showed that nicotine gum failed to significantly reduce smokeless tobacco abstinence effects, although those with high cotinine levels may receive some benefit from nicotine gum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Keywords

  • Abstinence effects
  • Nicotine gum
  • Smokeless tobacco

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Smokeless tobacco abstinence effects and nicotine gum dose'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this