Social norms and women's risk of intimate partner violence in Nepal

Cari Jo Clark, Gemma Ferguson, Binita Shrestha, Prabin Nanicha Shrestha, J. Michael Oakes, Jhumka Gupta, Susi McGhee, Yuk Fai Cheong, Kathryn M. Yount

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Social norms increasingly are the focus of intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention strategies but are among the least examined contextual factors in quantitative violence research. This study assesses the within-community, between-community, and contextual effect of a new measure of social norms (PVNS: Partner Violence Norms Scale) on women's risk of IPV. Data come from baseline surveys collected from 1435 female, married, reproductive-age participants, residing in 72 wards in three districts (Chitwan, Kapilvastu, Nawalparasi) in Nepal who were enrolled in a cluster randomized trial testing the impact of a social behavioral change communication intervention designed to prevent IPV. Results of unconditional multilevel logistic regression models indicated that there was cluster-level variability in the 12-month prevalence of physical (ICC = 0.07) and sexual (ICC = 0.05) IPV. Mean PVNS scores also varied across wards. When modeled simultaneously, PVNS scores aggregated to the ward-level and at the individual-level were associated with higher odds of physical (ORind = 1.12, CI = 1.04, 1.20; ORward = 1.40, CI = 1.15, 1.72) and sexual (ORind = 1.15, CI = 1.08, 1.24; ORward = 1.47, CI = 1.24, 1.74) IPV. The contextual effect was significant in the physical (0.23, se = 0.11, t = 2.12) and sexual (0.24, se = 0.09, t = 2.64) IPV models, suggesting that the ward-level association was larger than that at the individual-level. Adjustment for covariates slightly attenuated the ward-level association and eliminated the contextual association, suggesting that individual perceptions and the collective community phenomena were equally strong predictors of women's risk of IPV and should be taken into consideration when planning interventions. PVNS is a promising measure of social norms underpinning women's risk of IPV and warrants further psychometric testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-169
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume202
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The Change Starts at Home Project was funded by UK aid ( P06254 ) from the UK government , via the What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls Global Programme ( www.whatworks.co.za ). The funds were managed by the South African Medical Research Council . The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies.

Funding Information:
The Change Starts at Home Project was funded by UK aid (P06254) from the UK government, via the What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls Global Programme (www.whatworks.co.za). The funds were managed by the South African Medical Research Council. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors

Keywords

  • Domestic violence
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Nepal
  • Prevention
  • Social norms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social norms and women's risk of intimate partner violence in Nepal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this