Sociology of Health Care Reform: Building on Research and Analysis to Improve Health Care

David Mechanic, Donna D. McAlpine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health reform efforts in the United States have focused on resolving some of the fundamental irrationalities of the system whereby costs and services utilization are often not linked to improved patient outcomes. Sociologists have contributed to these efforts by documenting the extent of problems and by confronting central questions around issues of accountability, reimbursement, and rationing that must be addressed in order to achieve meaningful reform that controls costs, expands access, and improves quality. Major reform rarely occurs without “paying off ” powerful interests, a particularly difficult challenge in the context of a large and growing deficit. Central to achieving increased coverage and access, high quality, and cost control is change in reimbursement arrangements, increased accountability for both costs and outcomes, and criteria for rationing based on the evidence and accepted as legitimate by all stakeholders. Consensus about health reform requires trust. The traditional trust patients have in physicians provides an important base on which to build.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S147-S159
JournalJournal of health and social behavior
Volume51
Issue number1_suppl
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Keywords

  • illness behavior
  • managed care
  • medical care utilization
  • physician organization
  • reimbursement
  • trust

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sociology of Health Care Reform: Building on Research and Analysis to Improve Health Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this