Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: A comparison with a single-channel tactile device

A. E. Carney, M. Kienle, R. T. Miyamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Suprasegmental and segmental speech perception tasks were administered to 8 patients with single-channel cochlear implants. Suprasegmental tasks included the recognition of syllable number, syllabic stress, and intonation. Segmental tasks included the recognition of vowels and consonants in three modalities: visual only, implant only, and visual + implant. Results were compared to those obtained from artificially deafened adults using a single-channel vibrotactile device (Carney, 1988; Carney and Beachler, 1986). The patterns of responses for both suprasegmental and segmental tasks were highly similar for both groups of subjects, despite differences between the characteristics of the subject samples. These results suggest that single-channel sensory devices, whether they be cochlear implants or vibrotactile aids, produce similar patterns of speech perception errors, even when differences are observed in overall performance level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Speech and Hearing Research
Volume33
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1990

Keywords

  • Single-channel
  • cochlear implant
  • tactile aid

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: A comparison with a single-channel tactile device'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this