Standing in Terri Schiavo's shoes: The role of genre in end-of-life decision making

Mary L Schuster, Ann La Bree Russell, Dianne M. Bartels, Holli Kelly-Trombley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reports the findings from analysis of end-of-life court cases and case files from one state public guardianship administrator as well as interviews with guardians or surrogates to identify how language and principles of the courts are operationalized in end-of-life decisions for those who are unable to make decisions for themselves. We found that physicians and guardians worked well within the requirements of the genre to ensure the best interests for those whom they represent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-218
Number of pages24
JournalTechnical Communication Quarterly
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • end-of-life court cases
  • end-of-life decision making
  • medical rhetoric
  • public guardianship
  • surrogacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standing in Terri Schiavo's shoes: The role of genre in end-of-life decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this