TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing the relevance of parameterization to architectural epistemology
AU - Christenson, Mike
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Advances in building information modeling (BIM) deeply impact the production of new architecture; its benefits are obvious and its acceptance widespread. But how does BIM impact the study of existing architecture? Can BIM be assumed to operate as a neutral framework, equally applicable to the study of architecture anywhere? Using as a point of departure a recent oudine of the conceptual structure of parametric modeling prepared by Sacks, Eastman, and Lee (2004), this paper compares parametric models of two existing works of architecture: Mies van der Rohe's Crown Hall and Peter Zumthor's St. Benedict Chapel. The processes of parametrically modeling each building are specifically compared in two ways: first, parameters are established for each model; second, each model is "flexed" as a means of disclosing possible semantic relationships within each work of architecture. Because each building demands a different parameter-establishment strategy, and because the models permit different degrees of flexibility, the comparison illustrates the shortcomings of a "neutral framework" assumption to an architectural epistemology.
AB - Advances in building information modeling (BIM) deeply impact the production of new architecture; its benefits are obvious and its acceptance widespread. But how does BIM impact the study of existing architecture? Can BIM be assumed to operate as a neutral framework, equally applicable to the study of architecture anywhere? Using as a point of departure a recent oudine of the conceptual structure of parametric modeling prepared by Sacks, Eastman, and Lee (2004), this paper compares parametric models of two existing works of architecture: Mies van der Rohe's Crown Hall and Peter Zumthor's St. Benedict Chapel. The processes of parametrically modeling each building are specifically compared in two ways: first, parameters are established for each model; second, each model is "flexed" as a means of disclosing possible semantic relationships within each work of architecture. Because each building demands a different parameter-establishment strategy, and because the models permit different degrees of flexibility, the comparison illustrates the shortcomings of a "neutral framework" assumption to an architectural epistemology.
KW - Existing architecture
KW - Parametric modeling
KW - Representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651153058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651153058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3763/asre.2009.0022
DO - 10.3763/asre.2009.0022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67651153058
SN - 0003-8628
VL - 52
SP - 135
EP - 141
JO - Architectural Science Review
JF - Architectural Science Review
IS - 2
ER -