The constipation severity instrument: A validated measure

Madhulika G. Varma; Jennifer Y. Wang; Julia R. Berian; Taryn R. Patterson; G. Lindsay McCrea; Stacey L. Hart

doi:10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0

The constipation severity instrument: A validated measure

Madhulika G. Varma, Jennifer Y. Wang, Julia R. Berian, Taryn R. Patterson, G. Lindsay McCrea, Stacey L. Hart

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

100 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Constipation Severity Instrument. METHODS: Scale development was conducted in two stages: 1) 74 items were generated through a literature review and focus groups of constipated patients and medical providers; and 2) a preliminary instrument was administered to 191 constipated patients and 103 healthy volunteers. Test-retest reliability of the constipated group was assessed (N=90). Content, convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated by using other validated measures by performing one-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed three subscales: obstructive defecation, colonic inertia, and pain. Internal consistency (α=0.88-0.91) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.84-0.91) were high for all subscales. Constipated patients were grouped by Rome II criteria: functional constipation (22 percent), pelvic floor dyssynergia (15 percent), constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (23 percent), and no specific criteria (40 percent). Those with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome or pelvic floor dyssynergia scored higher on the Obstructive Defecation and Colonic Inertia subscales than those with functional constipation or no specific criteria (P=0.001-0.058). Subjects with functional constipation had much lower scores on the pain subscale than constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, or no specific criteria (P<0.009).The Constipation Severity Instrument subscale and total score correlated very highly with the subscales and total score of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom measure. The Constipation Severity Instrument subscales discriminated well between constipated patients and healthy volunteers (P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent divergent validity. Higher Constipation Severity Instrument scores inversely correlated with general quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Severity Instrument is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing constipated patients. Administration of the Constipation Severity Instrument to other constipated patients will further validate its use.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	162-172
Number of pages	11
Journal	Diseases of the colon and rectum
Volume	51
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0
State	Published - Feb 2008

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by the University of California, San Francisco Hellman Family Award for Early Career Faculty. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2 to 6, 2007. Reprints are not available. Address of correspondence: Madhulika G. Varma, M.D., Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 2330 Post Street, Suite 260, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. E-mail: varmam@surgery.ucsf.edu

Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

Bowel questionnaire
Constipation severity
Instrument validation
Symptom evaluation

Access

10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{fac1c45a4edf43b188219589f10c099e,

title = "The constipation severity instrument: A validated measure",

abstract = "PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Constipation Severity Instrument. METHODS: Scale development was conducted in two stages: 1) 74 items were generated through a literature review and focus groups of constipated patients and medical providers; and 2) a preliminary instrument was administered to 191 constipated patients and 103 healthy volunteers. Test-retest reliability of the constipated group was assessed (N=90). Content, convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated by using other validated measures by performing one-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed three subscales: obstructive defecation, colonic inertia, and pain. Internal consistency (α=0.88-0.91) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.84-0.91) were high for all subscales. Constipated patients were grouped by Rome II criteria: functional constipation (22 percent), pelvic floor dyssynergia (15 percent), constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (23 percent), and no specific criteria (40 percent). Those with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome or pelvic floor dyssynergia scored higher on the Obstructive Defecation and Colonic Inertia subscales than those with functional constipation or no specific criteria (P=0.001-0.058). Subjects with functional constipation had much lower scores on the pain subscale than constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, or no specific criteria (P<0.009).The Constipation Severity Instrument subscale and total score correlated very highly with the subscales and total score of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom measure. The Constipation Severity Instrument subscales discriminated well between constipated patients and healthy volunteers (P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent divergent validity. Higher Constipation Severity Instrument scores inversely correlated with general quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Severity Instrument is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing constipated patients. Administration of the Constipation Severity Instrument to other constipated patients will further validate its use.",

keywords = "Bowel questionnaire, Constipation severity, Instrument validation, Symptom evaluation",

author = "Varma, {Madhulika G.} and Wang, {Jennifer Y.} and Berian, {Julia R.} and Patterson, {Taryn R.} and McCrea, {G. Lindsay} and Hart, {Stacey L.}",

note = "Funding Information: Supported by the University of California, San Francisco Hellman Family Award for Early Career Faculty. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2 to 6, 2007. Reprints are not available. Address of correspondence: Madhulika G. Varma, M.D., Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 2330 Post Street, Suite 260, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. E-mail: varmam@surgery.ucsf.edu Copyright: Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2008",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "51",

pages = "162--172",

journal = "Diseases of the colon and rectum",

issn = "0012-3706",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The constipation severity instrument

T2 - A validated measure

AU - Varma, Madhulika G.

AU - Wang, Jennifer Y.

AU - Berian, Julia R.

AU - Patterson, Taryn R.

AU - McCrea, G. Lindsay

AU - Hart, Stacey L.

N1 - Funding Information: Supported by the University of California, San Francisco Hellman Family Award for Early Career Faculty. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2 to 6, 2007. Reprints are not available. Address of correspondence: Madhulika G. Varma, M.D., Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 2330 Post Street, Suite 260, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. E-mail: varmam@surgery.ucsf.edu Copyright: Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Constipation Severity Instrument. METHODS: Scale development was conducted in two stages: 1) 74 items were generated through a literature review and focus groups of constipated patients and medical providers; and 2) a preliminary instrument was administered to 191 constipated patients and 103 healthy volunteers. Test-retest reliability of the constipated group was assessed (N=90). Content, convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated by using other validated measures by performing one-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed three subscales: obstructive defecation, colonic inertia, and pain. Internal consistency (α=0.88-0.91) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.84-0.91) were high for all subscales. Constipated patients were grouped by Rome II criteria: functional constipation (22 percent), pelvic floor dyssynergia (15 percent), constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (23 percent), and no specific criteria (40 percent). Those with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome or pelvic floor dyssynergia scored higher on the Obstructive Defecation and Colonic Inertia subscales than those with functional constipation or no specific criteria (P=0.001-0.058). Subjects with functional constipation had much lower scores on the pain subscale than constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, or no specific criteria (P<0.009).The Constipation Severity Instrument subscale and total score correlated very highly with the subscales and total score of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom measure. The Constipation Severity Instrument subscales discriminated well between constipated patients and healthy volunteers (P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent divergent validity. Higher Constipation Severity Instrument scores inversely correlated with general quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Severity Instrument is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing constipated patients. Administration of the Constipation Severity Instrument to other constipated patients will further validate its use.

AB - PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Constipation Severity Instrument. METHODS: Scale development was conducted in two stages: 1) 74 items were generated through a literature review and focus groups of constipated patients and medical providers; and 2) a preliminary instrument was administered to 191 constipated patients and 103 healthy volunteers. Test-retest reliability of the constipated group was assessed (N=90). Content, convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated by using other validated measures by performing one-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed three subscales: obstructive defecation, colonic inertia, and pain. Internal consistency (α=0.88-0.91) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.84-0.91) were high for all subscales. Constipated patients were grouped by Rome II criteria: functional constipation (22 percent), pelvic floor dyssynergia (15 percent), constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (23 percent), and no specific criteria (40 percent). Those with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome or pelvic floor dyssynergia scored higher on the Obstructive Defecation and Colonic Inertia subscales than those with functional constipation or no specific criteria (P=0.001-0.058). Subjects with functional constipation had much lower scores on the pain subscale than constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, or no specific criteria (P<0.009).The Constipation Severity Instrument subscale and total score correlated very highly with the subscales and total score of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom measure. The Constipation Severity Instrument subscales discriminated well between constipated patients and healthy volunteers (P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent divergent validity. Higher Constipation Severity Instrument scores inversely correlated with general quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Severity Instrument is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing constipated patients. Administration of the Constipation Severity Instrument to other constipated patients will further validate its use.

KW - Bowel questionnaire

KW - Constipation severity

KW - Instrument validation

KW - Symptom evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149136187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149136187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0

DO - 10.1007/s10350-007-9140-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 18172725

AN - SCOPUS:39149136187

SN - 0012-3706

VL - 51

SP - 162

EP - 172

JO - Diseases of the colon and rectum

JF - Diseases of the colon and rectum

IS - 2

ER -

The constipation severity instrument: A validated measure

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this