The critical use of population-based medical databases for prostate cancer research

Charles D. Scales, Philipp Dahm

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Population-based investigations comprise a significant portion of the prostate cancer literature and contribute considerably to our knowledge of this disease. It is important to recognize, however, the inherent limitations of observational study designs. In this review, we will highlight important population-based studies in prostate cancer of high methodological quality using the framework of the recently published Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings of population-based studies of prostate cancer have generated key advances in our understanding of prostate cancer outcomes and epidemiology, which are highlighted in this review. The STROBE criteria, which were developed to promote the transparent reporting of observational studies, provide an excellent framework to determine the validity of conclusions drawn from large population-based studies. SUMMARY: Population-based research is a powerful tool for understanding prostate cancer, but clinicians and investigators must interpret findings appropriately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-325
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Urology
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Keywords

  • Observational study
  • Population-based registry
  • Prostate cancer
  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology initiative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The critical use of population-based medical databases for prostate cancer research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this