The Developmental Effects of Early Life Stress: An Overview of Current Theoretical Frameworks

Camelia E. Hostinar, Megan R Gunnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

The field of psychobiology has two major theories for talking about stress and health: the allostatic load model, which grew out of biological and neuroscience approaches to understanding health and disease, and the adaptive calibration model, which developed out of an explicitly evolutionary-developmental framework. Both are based on assumptions that the brain coordinates a distributed and dynamic set of neural circuits that regulate behavior and stress physiology to help the organism adapt to the demands of the environment. Both models support the notion that experiences early in life are embedded into the regulation of stress systems in ways that shape the organism's future responses. These two paradigms differ in their emphasis on whether changes in how stress systems function are viewed as adaptive or maladaptive. The goal of this review is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each framework and to discuss some implications for future studies and for policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-406
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • early adversity
  • stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Developmental Effects of Early Life Stress: An Overview of Current Theoretical Frameworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this