Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Press/Media
Datasets
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
The impudence of being earnest: Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility
Matt Carlson
, Jason T. Peifer
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
19
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impudence of being earnest: Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Arts & Humanities
Impudence
100%
Journalists
50%
Discursive
48%
Earnestness
44%
Journalistic Discourse
43%
Public Sphere
42%
Responsibility
41%
Epistemic Authority
40%
Sanity
39%
News Media
35%
Technological Change
33%
Cultural Change
33%
Public Discourse
30%
Contestation
30%
Economic Change
30%
September 11 Attacks
29%
Organizing
25%
Legislation
25%
Healthcare
19%
Evaluation
15%
Social Sciences
journalist
53%
responsibility
31%
technological change
31%
discourse
31%
cultural change
30%
economic change
29%
news
21%
health care
20%
legislation
19%
anxiety
18%
interpretation
17%
event
16%
evaluation
13%
Engineering & Materials Science
Health care
58%
Economics
36%