TY - JOUR
T1 - The inter-rater reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders module i and module ii
T2 - A preliminary report on consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients
AU - Somma, Antonella
AU - Borroni, Serena
AU - Gialdi, Giulia
AU - Carlotta, Davide
AU - Giarolli, Laura Emanuela
AU - Barranca, Margherita
AU - Cerioli, Carlotta
AU - Franzoni, Chiara
AU - Masci, Elisabetta
AU - Manini, Riccardo
AU - Busso, Stefano Luca
AU - Ruotolo, Giulia
AU - Krueger, Robert F.
AU - Markon, Kristian E.
AU - Fossati, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Guilford Press.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.
AB - To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.
KW - Criterion A
KW - Criterion B
KW - LPFS
KW - PID-5
KW - Personality disorders
KW - SCID-5-AMPD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100746463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100746463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511
DO - 10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511
M3 - Article
C2 - 33834856
AN - SCOPUS:85100746463
SN - 0885-579X
VL - 34
SP - 95
EP - 123
JO - Journal of personality disorders
JF - Journal of personality disorders
ER -