The longevity of memory CD8 T cell responses after repetitive antigen stimulations

Deepa Rai, Matthew D. Martin, Vladimir P. Badovinac

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In experimental models in which the Ag-stimulation history of memory CD8 T cell populations was clearly defined (adoptive transfer of a known number of TCR-transgenic memory CD8 T cells), all facets of the ensuing CD8 T cell responses, including proliferative expansion, duration and extent of contraction, diversification of memory CD8 T cell transcriptomes, and life-long survival, were dependent on the number of prior Ag encounters. However, the extent to which sequential adoptive-transfer models reflect the physiological scenario in which memory CD8 T cells are generated by repetitive Ag challenges of individual hosts (no adoptive transfer involved) is not known. Direct comparison of endogenous memory CD8 T cell responses generated in repetitively infected hosts revealed that recurrent homologous boosting was required to preserve the numbers and increase the phenotypic and functional complexity of the developing memory CD8 T cell pool. Although life-long survival of the memory CD8 T cells was not impacted, phenotype (i.e., upregulation of CD62L) and function (i.e., homeostatic turnover, Ag-stimulated IL-2 production) of repeatedly stimulated memory CD8 T cells were dependent on time after last Ag encounter. Therefore, repetitive Ag challenges of individual hosts can substantially influence the numerical and functional attributes of polyclonal memory CD8 T cells, a notion with important implications for the design of future vaccination strategies aimed at increasing the number of protective memory CD8 T cells.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5652-5659
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Immunology
Volume192
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The longevity of memory CD8 T cell responses after repetitive antigen stimulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this