The rhetoric of counsel and Thomas Elyot's Of the Knowledge Which Maketh a Wise Man

Arthur E. Walzer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Plato's confrontation with Dionysius I, the so-called "tyrant of Sicily," became famous as a cautionary tale of the perils of offering unwelcome advice to a powerful prince. Within early modern England, this tale took on added currency in the context of humanists' ambitions to serve as counselors in the court of Henry VIII. The humanist scholar Thomas Elyot (1490-1546), who briefly and unsuccessfully served at Henry's court, re-created Plato's exchange with Dionysius I in his dramatic dialogue The Knowledge Whiche Maketh a Wise Man (1533). In his dialogue, Elyot imagines Plato returning to Athens after his brief period of enslavement, where he meets the philosopher/rhetorician Aristippus. Aristippus challenges Plato by positing that Plato's dangerous words to Dionysius violated rhetorical tenets of propriety and timing. In the course of their extended exchange, two different versions of the rhetoric of counsel surface - one based on principles of philosophy and one based on strategic rhetoric.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-45
Number of pages22
JournalPhilosophy and Rhetoric
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 13 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The rhetoric of counsel and Thomas Elyot's Of the Knowledge Which Maketh a Wise Man'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this