The use of chemoprophylaxis after floods to reduce the occurrence and impact of leptospirosis outbreaks

Maria Cristina, Jorge Velasco-Hernandez, Kyung Duk Min, Deise Galan Leonel, David Baca-Carrasco, Matthew E. Gompper, Rudy Hartskeerl, Claudia Munoz-Zanzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Record-breaking and devastating rainfall events have occurred in the past decade. Rain and floods are considered the main risk factors for leptospirosis and several outbreaks have been reported following extreme weather events. In such situations, one possible intervention to prevent leptospirosis cases in high-risk groups is the use of chemoprophylaxis. However, not enough evidence of its effect is available. The objectives of this study were to review the literature on the current practices of chemoprophylaxis for leptospirosis and to explore, using a mathematical model, how various chemoprophylaxis scenarios may affect the progression of a leptospirosis outbreak. Twenty-six peer-reviewed publications were selected (10 quantitative studies, two systematic reviews and 14 articles of other types). Oral doxycycline was the most used antibiotic for chemoprophylaxis of leptospirosis. Post-exposure prophylaxis was assessed in four studies following a natural disaster. Although evidence of the effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis is inconsistent, the direction of association supported a protective effect for morbidity and mortality. The theoretical model showed how the assumed benefit of chemoprophylaxis was influenced by the time and rate of administration. Future models should consider the heterogeneity of affected communities, improved estimates of the effect of chemoprophylaxis on leptospirosis infection and disease, as well as potential detrimental impacts. Additional research is critical to provide clear evidence-based recommendations for leptospirosis control during an outbreak. The results of this study suggest that chemoprophylaxis may provide some protection in reducing the number of leptospirosis cases after a high-risk exposure; however, the effective benefit may depend on a variety of factors such as the timing and coverage of prophylaxis. The information summarized can be used to support decision-making during a high-risk event.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number594
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), United States of America, sponsored the meetings of the NIMBioS Working Group on Leptospirosis Modeling. The authors acknowledge all participants of the Working Group: Zhilan Feng, Rudy Hartskeerl, Suzanne O?Regan, Maria Cristina Schneider, Andrea Previtali, Alejandro de la Pena-Moctezuma, Claudia Munoz-Zanzi, Matteo Convertino, Suzanne Lenhart, Vincent Herbreteau, Matthew Gompper, and Jorge Velasco-Hernandez. The transdisciplinary discussions and collaboration during theWorking Group meetings were essential to advance this study. Special acknowledgments to Suzanne Lenhart for co-leading early work on the mathematical model. Authors recognize the Global Environmental Action Network (GLEAN) for promoting this and other collaborative efforts to reduce the global impact of leptospirosis. To Gustavo Machado that participated in the early stage of the search for information for this study. Authors also thank the Central America?s national authorities and PAHO colleagues, who shared with us their experience and needs facing outbreaks of leptospirosis.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Chemoprophylaxis
  • Extreme weather
  • Leptospirosis
  • Outbreaks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of chemoprophylaxis after floods to reduce the occurrence and impact of leptospirosis outbreaks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this