The value of crossdating to retain high-frequency variability, climate signals, and extreme events in environmental proxies

Bryan A. Black, Daniel Griffin, Peter van der Sleen, Alan D. Wanamaker, James H. Speer, David C. Frank, David W. Stahle, Neil Pederson, Carolyn A. Copenheaver, Valerie Trouet, Shelly Griffin, Bronwyn M. Gillanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

High-resolution biogenic and geologic proxies in which one increment or layer is formed per year are crucial to describing natural ranges of environmental variability in Earth's physical and biological systems. However, dating controls are necessary to ensure temporal precision and accuracy; simple counts cannot ensure that all layers are placed correctly in time. Originally developed for tree-ring data, crossdating is the only such procedure that ensures all increments have been assigned the correct calendar year of formation. Here, we use growth-increment data from two tree species, two marine bivalve species, and a marine fish species to illustrate sensitivity of environmental signals to modest dating error rates. When falsely added or missed increments are induced at one and five percent rates, errors propagate back through time and eliminate high-frequency variability, climate signals, and evidence of extreme events while incorrectly dating and distorting major disturbances or other low-frequency processes. Our consecutive Monte Carlo experiments show that inaccuracies begin to accumulate in as little as two decades and can remove all but decadal-scale processes after as little as two centuries. Real-world scenarios may have even greater consequence in the absence of crossdating. Given this sensitivity to signal loss, the fundamental tenets of crossdating must be applied to fully resolve environmental signals, a point we underscore as the frontiers of growth-increment analysis continue to expand into tropical, freshwater, and marine environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2582-2595
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal change biology
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
BAB was supported by NSF grant OCE 1434732 as well as the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1440409), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. ADW was supported by NSF Grant OCE-1003438. BMG was supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (FT100100767). We thank A. Tepley, S. Shafer, and R. Kormanyos for assistance in developing the Browder Creek Douglas-fir chronology.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • climate reconstruction
  • crossdating
  • dendrochronology
  • global change
  • paleoclimate
  • sclerochronology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of crossdating to retain high-frequency variability, climate signals, and extreme events in environmental proxies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this