Theft is property! the recursive logic of dispossession

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article offers a preliminary critical-historical reconstruction of the concept of dispossession. Part I examines its role in eighteenth- and nineteenthcentury struggles against European feudal land tenure. Drawing upon Marx’s critique of French anarchism in particular, I identify a persistent limitation at the heart of the concept. Since dispossession presupposes prior possession, recourse to it appears conservative and tends to reinforce the very proprietary and commoditized models of social relations that radical critics generally seek to undermine. Part II turns to use of the term in Indigenous struggles against colonization, both in order to better grasp the stakes of the above problematic and suggest a way beyond it. Through a reconstruction of arguments by Indigenous scholars and activists, I seek to show the coherence and novelty of their formulation by suggesting that dispossession has come to name a unique historical process, one in which property is generated under conditions that require divestment and alienation from those who appear, only retroactively, as its original owners. In this way, theft and property are related in a recursive, rather than strictly unilinear, manner. Part III provides a specific historical example in the form of nineteenth-century US property law concerning squatters and homesteaders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-28
Number of pages26
JournalPolitical Theory
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Keywords

  • Colonialism
  • Dispossession
  • Expropriation
  • Property
  • Theft

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Theft is property! the recursive logic of dispossession'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this