Tibial tunnel placement accuracy during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Independent femoral versus transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques

Thomas C. Keller, Marc Tompkins, Kostas Economopoulos, Matthew D. Milewski, Cree Gaskin, Stephen Brockmeier, Joseph Hart, Mark D. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to compare the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement using independent femoral (IF) versus transtibial (TT) techniques. Methods Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees were randomized so that one knee in the pair underwent arthroscopic TT drilling of the femoral tunnel and the other underwent IF drilling through an accessory medial portal. For both techniques, an attempt was made to place the femoral and tibial tunnels as close to the center of the respective anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprints as possible. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography using a technique optimized for ligament evaluation allowed comparison of the anatomic ACL tibial footprint to the tibial tunnel aperture. The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint, as well as the distance from the center of the tunnel aperture to the center of the footprint, was measured. Additionally, graft obliquity relative to the tibial plateau was evaluated in the sagittal plane. Results The percentage of tibial tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint averaged 71.6% ± 17.2% versus 52.1% ± 23.4% (P =.04) in the IF and TT groups, respectively. The distance from the center of the footprint to the center of the tibial tunnel aperture was 3.50 ± 1.6 mm and 4.40 ± 1.7 mm (P =.27) in the IF and TT groups, respectively. TT drilling placed 6 of 10 tunnels posterior to the center of the footprint versus 3 of 10 tunnels in IF drilling. The graft obliquity angles were 54.8° in TT specimens and 47.5° in IF specimens (P =.09). Conclusions This study adds to the literature suggesting that TT drilling with an 8-mm reamer has deleterious effects on tibial tunnel aperture and position. IF drilling, which does not involve repeated reaming of the tibial tunnel, is associated with the placement of a higher percentage of the tunnel aperture within the native tibial footprint. There was not a significant difference between the IF and TT techniques in their ability to place the center of the tibial aperture near the center of the footprint or in graft obliquity. Clinical Relevance ACL reconstruction has continued to evolve in an attempt to restore the functional anatomy and biomechanical behavior of the knee. Tibial tunnel characteristics - such as location, aperture topography, and tunnel obliquity - are important factors to consider in ACL reconstruction. This study compares tibial tunnels after IF and TT techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1116-1123
Number of pages8
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tibial tunnel placement accuracy during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Independent femoral versus transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this