Transforaminal lumbar puncture: An alternative technique in patients with challenging access

D. R. Nascene, C. Ozutemiz, H. Estby, A. M. McKinney, J. B. Rykken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interlaminar lumbar puncture and cervical puncture may not be ideal in all circumstances. Recently, we have used a transforaminal approach in selected situations. Between May 2016 and December 2017, twenty-six transforaminal lumbar punctures were performed in 9 patients (25 CT-guided, 1 fluoroscopy-guided). Seven had spinal muscular atrophy and were referred for intrathecal nusinersen administration. In 2, CT myelography was performed via transforaminal lumbar puncture. The lumbar posterior elements were completely fused in 8, and there was an overlying abscess in 1. The L1-2 level was used in 2; the L2-3 level, in 10; the L3- 4 level, in 12; and the L4 -5 level, in 2 procedures. Post-lumbar puncture headache was observed on 4 occasions, which resolved without blood patching. One patient felt heat and pain at the injection site that resolved spontaneously within hours. One patient had radicular pain that resolved with conservative treatment. Transforaminal lumbar puncture may become an effective alternative to classic interlaminar lumbar puncture or cervical puncture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)986-991
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transforaminal lumbar puncture: An alternative technique in patients with challenging access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this