Tribal-state affairs: American states as 'disclaiming' sovereigns

David E. Wilkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The history of tribal-state political relations has been contentious from the beginning of the republic. As a result of these tensions, the relationship of tribal nations and the federal government wasfederalized when the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788. Thus, a number of states, especially in the West, were required in their organic acts and constitutions to forever disclaim jurisdiction over Indian property and persons. This article analyzes these disclaimer clauses, explains the factors that have enabled the states to assume some jurisdiclional presence in Indian Country, examines the key issues in which disclaimers continue to carry significant weight, and argues that the federal government should reclaim its role as the lone constitutional authority to deal with indigenous nations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-81
Number of pages27
JournalPublius
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tribal-state affairs: American states as 'disclaiming' sovereigns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this