Abstract
This chapter distinguishes two senses of cultural relativism and discusses their different moral implications. The first sense, called verstehen relativism, means an attempt to understand and "feel one's way into" another culture, a process that can also produce a deeper appreciation of one's own culture. The second sense is called here egalitarian or strong relativism, which holds that cultures are to be judged by their own standards, and one culture is not to be viewed as superior to another overall or in any aspect. Arguments are given that egalitarian relativism is both logically inconsistent and psychologically undermined by the fact that cultural practices and norms often work for the benefit of more powerful subgroups within the culture. Difficulties of formulating universal standards are discussed. It is concluded that strong cultural relativism is often unjustified, but cultural comparisons can be made only argumentatively rather than by universal algorithm.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology |
Subtitle of host publication | Culture and Developmental Systems |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
Pages | 299-341 |
Number of pages | 43 |
Volume | 38 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781119301981 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781119247654 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 21 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Cultural relativism
- Egalitarian
- Gender
- Inequality
- Trade-offs
- Universalist
- Verstehen