Understanding the Relationship Between Moral Judgment Development and Individual Characteristics: The Role of Educational Contexts

Yukiko Maeda, Steve J. Thoma, Muriel J. Bebeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines variation in moral judgment level as measured by the Defining Issues Test 2 (DIT-2; J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez, 1998), based on individual demographic information and educational contexts. Individual DIT-2 scores and demographic information were obtained from the archived data sets housed at the Center for the Study of Ethical Development. The information on educational contexts was obtained by surveying the researchers who initially gathered the data. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze DIT-2 data from 7,642 individuals and 65 institutions. Findings indicate that average DIT-2 scores vary significantly among institutions. Further, the authors found that the strength of the relation of DIT-2 scores to gender and English language status is significant and consistent across contexts, whereas the strength of the relation to educational level and political identity varies across contexts. These findings indicate that information about the individuals' educational context as well as the broader regional contexts should be taken into account to understand variation in individual levels of moral judgment. The findings can also be used as an interpretive guide for DIT-2 users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-247
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • Defining Issues Test
  • educational contexts
  • higher education
  • moral judgment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the Relationship Between Moral Judgment Development and Individual Characteristics: The Role of Educational Contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this