Urban health in the US and UK: The long 19th century

Susan Craddock, Tim Brown

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter we explore health of populations within a context of intensifying urban industrialization and the consequent economic, social, and political relations generating particular forms of pathogenicity in the 19th century UK and US. Life expectancies actually went down during the course of the century as poverty deepened, sanitation remained largely ignored, and domestic and work conditions were suboptimal for many. Epidemics did find these conditions optimal, and outbreaks of smallpox, yellow fever, and malaria were common, in addition to the upward trend of tuberculosis. Colonization, the end of slavery, and high immigration rates fueled race-based theories of disease susceptibility as well as policies of blame that made life even harder for nonwhite populations. The rise of statistics made these policies easier, with the ability to pinpoint those urban neighborhoods more heavily burdened with disease than others. Infant and maternal mortality were also remarkably high. By the second half of the century, sanitation had become more widespread, and its interventions led to a gradual decline of tuberculosis and epidemic diseases. With no “magic bullets,�? the 19th century in many ways parallels health patterns in our current antibiotic-resistant existence, with burgeoning cities, deepening inequalities, and policies of neglect and individual responsibility that have little means to improve life expectancies that once more, for the first time since the 19th century, are showing a decline in two of the richest countries in the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Global Urban Health
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages33-67
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9781315465449
ISBN (Print)9781138206250
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Urban health in the US and UK: The long 19th century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this