When Do Students in Low-SES Schools Perform Better-Than-Expected on a High-Stakes Test? Analyzing School, Teacher, Teaching, and Professional Development Characteristics

Christian Fischer, Barry Fishman, Abigail Jurist Levy, Arthur Eisenkraft, Christopher Dede, Frances Lawrenz, Yueming Jia, Janna Fuccillo Kook, Kim Frumin, Ayana McCoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

This empirical study analyzed data from 638 teachers and 11,800 students in low-socioeconomic status (SES) urban schools (and schools with urban characteristics) exploring associations of school, teacher, teaching, and professional development characteristics toward student performance on the revised Advanced Placement (AP) Biology and AP Chemistry examinations. The analyses indicated that districts per-student funding allocations, the days of instruction, teachers’ knowledge and experience, and some aspects of teachers’ professional development participation were significantly associated with student performance on AP science examinations that was better than predicted by students’ Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1280-1314
Number of pages35
JournalUrban Education
Volume55
Issue number8-9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords

  • high-stakes testing
  • professional development
  • school context
  • science education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Do Students in Low-SES Schools Perform Better-Than-Expected on a High-Stakes Test? Analyzing School, Teacher, Teaching, and Professional Development Characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this